Introduction of Ryjays DC Weed Dispensary Juice Bar Washington Reviews

Ryjays DC Weed Dispensary Juice Bar Washington reviews highlight its reputation for providing top-quality cannabis products and freshly made juices. Located in Washington, this dispensary offers a unique experience by combining a well-stocked cannabis selection with a vibrant juice bar. Customers appreciate the welcoming atmosphere, knowledgeable staff, and competitive pricing. This review delves into its offerings, customer service, pricing structure, and overall experience to help potential visitors make an informed decision.

Location and Ambience

Located in the heart of Washington, Ryjays provides a welcoming atmosphere. The decor is modern, and the ambiance is relaxing. Customers have appreciated the well-organized layout and friendly staff. The environment ensures a smooth shopping experience, making it an attractive destination for both locals and tourists.

Product Selection and Quality

Ryjays offers a diverse range of cannabis products, including flowers, edibles, concentrates, and pre-rolls. The dispensary is known for sourcing high-quality strains from reputable growers. Customers frequently praise the consistency and potency of their products. The juice bar complements this selection with organic, fresh-pressed juices that enhance the overall experience.

Customer Service and Staff Expertise

The staff at Ryjays are well-trained and knowledgeable about cannabis products. Customers have reported receiving helpful recommendations based on their preferences and needs. Whether a first-time visitor or a seasoned user, everyone can find expert guidance. The commitment to customer satisfaction sets this dispensary apart.

Pricing and Special Offers

Ryjays maintains competitive pricing, making high-quality cannabis accessible. Regular discounts and promotions are offered, providing customers with great value. Membership programs and referral bonuses further enhance the affordability of their products. Many reviews highlight the fairness of their pricing compared to other dispensaries in the area.

Online Ordering and Delivery Services

For convenience, Ryjays offers an online ordering system. Customers can browse products, place orders, and choose pickup or delivery options. The delivery service ensures timely arrivals, enhancing customer satisfaction. The seamless ordering process adds to the overall positive experience of shopping at this dispensary.

Customer Reviews and Testimonials

Reviews for Ryjays are overwhelmingly positive. Customers appreciate the quality of products, the professionalism of staff, and the relaxing ambiance. Many highlight the freshness of the juices as an added benefit. A few constructive criticisms focus on occasional wait times during peak hours, but the efficient service generally offsets this issue.

Final Verdict

Ryjays DC Weed Dispensary Juice Bar in Washington stands out not only for its premium cannabis but also for its fresh juice offerings. Moreover, its excellent customer service ensures that visitors feel welcomed and valued. In addition, the relaxing ambiance creates a comfortable space for customers to enjoy their experience. Furthermore, with competitive pricing, Ryjays continues to attract a loyal customer base. For those seeking a unique and enjoyable dispensary experience, Ryjays remains a top choice.

Cogent Communications is a tier 1 network providing a variety of services. Cogent provides Internet connections and colocation to over 50,000 customers. Their network spans over 40 countries and their network is all fiber optic (no copper).

Cogent was founded in 1999 and is based in the United States. They made a name for themselves by offering low price bandwidth. By offering lower prices on their bandwidth they were able to compete with existing Internet Service Providers (ISP). When the dot-com market crash happened, many of their competitors lost much of their market value. Cogent was able to buy out and acquire many of these competitors, quickly rising to become one of the largest ISPs in the world.

Cogent’s leadership can be aggressive in their goals which leads to potential conflicts with other networks and might hurt their customers. They are also concerned about keeping costs low, which means better prices, but might also mean less quality service.

The Good Things About Cogent Communications

Cogent when transit-free in 2008. For a company to have grown from a startup to a Tier 1 network in less than a decade really says something. Clearly Cogent is doing a lot of things the right way.

Cogent has over 85,000 miles of fiber optic connections spanning the globe. Their network is “data only”, meaning they they do not provide or use voice-based networks. Doing so allows them to offer a better price on data bandwidth.

Price

Price is the main selling point for getting service from Cogent. They are simply cheaper than most other providers. They keep costs down in a number of ways. Another example of them keeping their costs down is that they do not spend money on advertising.

Fiber Optic Network

Cogent’s network is all optical. They do not use copper for their backbone connections. Fiber is more secure and allows cables to be run a further distance than copper.

That being said, a properly configured GigE copper connection will provide the same quality of service and speed that a GigE fiber connection will provide.

Cogent offers standard speeds of 100Mbps or less, GigE and 10GigE ports. Network uptime is above 99.9%. Cogent does include a Service Level Agreement for all their customers.

Quality Support

Cogent NOC support is regarded as competent and timely. This sort of thing always varies, and you will hear horror stories about the support of every single Internet provider, but by and large Cogent has well trained and knowledgeable support.

The Not So Good

Cogent is great at offering cheap bandwidth. However, they are also known to have overly aggressive leadership that has made decisions that have hurt their customers.

Peering Disputes

Cogent Communications has a leadership that is willing to literately break the Internet to get what they believe is fair. Cogent has a history of not peering with certain companies because they cannot come to a mutual agreement on the terms of their peering.

What this means is that there are times that certain parts of the Internet will not be accessible to customers of Cogent. If Cogent is your only upstream and they are not willing to connect to another network, all the devices in that network will become inaccessible to you.

In 2005 Level 3 (another tier 1 network) and Cogent got into a peering dispute so involved that for a period of time the two networks stopped connecting to one another. This led to devices within Level 3’s network to be unable to reach devices within Cogent’s network and vice versa.

This type of peering disagreements continue to this day over IPv6. Cogent and Hurricane Electric (an IPv6 tier 1 network) continue to not have any connectivity with one another. More recently, Cogent and Google have stopped all IPv6 connections between the two. Customers of Cogent are unable to reach Google’s or Hurricane Electric’s network over IPv6.

Peering disputes happen, but for cogent they seem to happen more often and the repercussions are more sever for their customers.

Prioritization of Packet

Cogent claims to adhere to network neutrality. They state they “do not prioritize packet transmissions on the basis of the content of the packet”. However, in 2014 they admitted that they do exactly this. Cogent admitted they have a Quality of Service system in place to de-prioritized traffic from content providers and prioritize traffic for retail customers.

Cogent does not believe this type of prioritization goes against net neutrality because it does not create and “fast lane” and a “slow lane” in the traditional sense of the terms.

Not The Best For Reaching Eyeballs

Cogent has been pretty open about their lack of capacity when reaching “eyeball” networks during peak times. This means that if you are going to be mostly trying to reach home users, Cogent might be slower than other networks.

Should You Use Cogent?

Cogent Communications is great in terms of price and they offer good quality support. If you are in a building that is already connected to Cogent then it would be a mistake to not ask for a quote from them. Also, be sure to bargain with their sales representative. You can usually get a lower price than their first quote.

Due to Cogent’s history of peering disputes you may want to avoid them as your only uplink. If your organization can have only a single ISP, you may be better off with someone else. Specifically, a smaller non-tier 1 ISP that connects to multiple tier 1 ISPs may be the best choice.

I love graphs, charts and visualizations. I find that telling a story through data is a great way to express ideas. These types of visualizations are especially great for translating analytic data into easy to understand information.

The modern Internet has a ton of different ways for web developers to express data visualizations and build graphs. Static images, SVG images, HTML5 Canvas are all great ways to build graphs and web visualizations. For each of these mediums there is a ton of different libraries. This includes numerous JavaScript libraries such as GoJS, D3.js and Chart.js. Each of these libraries excels at certain things.

This post is about GoJS and what it excels at, but also where it falls short compared to other JavaScript graphing libraries.

I have personally used a lot of different JavaScript visualization libraries, including D3, Chart.js, Highcharts, GoJS, Leaflet, Chartist.js, and plain old HTML5 Canvas. My main experience with GoJS is building enterprise level web applications. For personal projects I use other libraries. I will explain why this is the case as I tell you more about GoJS.

Great Things About GoJS

The first thing to understand about GoJS is that it is a juggernaut of a library. What I mean is that it is super powerful and able to do a ton of stuff. It is more powerful, out of the box, than most other JavaScript graphing libraries. To do what GoJS does is other libraries would take a lot of work.

This is the main reason that I have used GoJS for enterprise level apps. My development team would end up spending a ton of time (and money) recreating all the features that GoJS provides. The amount of features built in to GoJS allows us to create an exceptional graphing tool in less time.

If you have not done so, take a look at the examples on the GoJS website. They give you a good idea of all the features and customizations that GoJS comes with.

I don’t want to mislead anyone and make them think that GoJS requires no work. This is a JavaScript library that still needs to be implemented by JavaScript developers. You will still need to write the code to make GoJS do what you want it to do.

The amount of code that I have had to write to get GoJS to do what I want it to do is far less than I would have had to write for a tool such as D3.js. I am certain I can do the same things that I do in GoJS using D3, but it would take a lot more time and effort to do so in D3.

GoJS is professionally developed. This means that it has a dedicated team working on the product and working on fixing any bugs that might arise. It also means that the documentation for the library is extensive and well written. Unlike free, open source projects, GoJS has a paid team that is there to ensure that the library is easy to use and understand. They spend part of their days working on documentation. This also means that if you ask a question on the GoJS website forum, the reply you get will likely be from someone who has deep knowledge of the library.

GoJS is especially great at graphs that have nodes and links. In fact, this is its specialty. If you need bar charts or pie charts, go with another library. If you want nodes and links that look good and are highly interactive, GoJS is a very powerful tool.

GoJS The Bad Parts

GoJS does have some drawbacks, and these are the reason I have never used GoJS on a personal projects.

One is that it costs money. You can contact their sales department for actual pricing, but the library is more money that I would be willing to spend on a side project. The money is well worth it for companies which are selling enterprise products, but probably not worth it for individuals working on smaller projects. You can try out GoJS for free for an unlimited period of time, so feel free to experiment and build something with the library, but you will need to buy a license if you plan on using GoJS for a commercial venture.

Another drawback of GoJS is that it is not open source. While the library does have great, professionally written documentation and arguably an even more informative forum, you cannot actually see the underlying GoJS code. This can be frustrating if you are trying to do something that is not built in to the library. There have been times where I was trying to implement a design concept into the library that was not built in to the library. It would have been a lot easier to implement these concepts if I had known exactly what GoJS is doing under the hood.

That being said, I was always able to figure out a way to do what I wanted, and the GoJS team was always helpful if I posted a question or asked for assistance on their forums.

Finally, because GoJS is so powerful, there is a lot to learn when first using the library. Though the documentation is great, it is still very confusing understanding all the different parts of the GoJS library (graphObjects, parts, panels, nodes, links, adornments, layers, etc.) That’s a problem you will run into when using any library as powerful as GoJS. There’s a steep learning curve and if you need to get a project done by next week, GoJS might be too complex for your needs.

On that note, this is not necessarily a negative or a positive but I did notice that GoJS has a lot of documentation explaining things. This is very different from D3, which tends to has a lot of examples but less documentation. GoJS documentation tells you how things work; D3 documentation shows you how to do something. I don’t know which of these approaches I like more. I feel like D3’s example based documentation will get you up and running faster, while GoJS’s explanation based documentation will give you a more in-depth understanding of what is going on. I guess it all depends on what type of learner you are.

Should You Use GoJS?

If you need a high powered graphing library that allows you to do a ton of things with nodes and links, and you are willing to spend a bit of money? Then yes. If you don’t need a ton of powerful features then you can probably find a free library that is more simple to learn. It all depends on the type of project you are working on.

Personally I have been very happy with GoJS in building a very powerful and highly customized enterprise level application.